Nanolumens Nixel 9 Flex vs Unilumin Usurface III 10 (1200×1200)

9.525 mm against 10 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Nanolumens Nixel 9 Flex	Unilumin Usurface III 10 (1200×1200)
Manufacturer	Nanolumens	Unilumin
Pixel pitch	9.525 mm	10 mm
Cabinet	304.8 × 152.4 mm	1200 × 1200 mm
Brightness	1,800 nits	8,000 nits
Refresh rate	not published	not published
Viewing angle	170° / 160°	140° / 120°
Pixels per cabinet	32 × 16	120 × 120
Pixels per m²	11,022	10,000
Weight	1.25 kg (27 kg/m²)	71.1 kg (49 kg/m²)
Max power	20.9 W (450 W/m²)	936 W (650 W/m²)
Typical power	6.3 W	312 W
Max hang	not published	not published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Nanolumens Nixel 9 Flex	Unilumin Usurface III 10 (1200×1200)
Wall built	25 × 28, 7.62 × 4.27 m	8 × 5, 9.60 × 6.00 m
Panels needed	700 + 35 spare	40 + 2 spare
Resolution	800 × 448 px	960 × 600 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,190 kg	2,944 kg
Load per point	~476 kg across 3	~883 kg across 4
Power, full white	14.6 kW	37.4 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	5	15
Data runs	1 at ≤1015/port	2 at ≤36/port
Truck, linear	25.4 m	5.4 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.62 × 4.27 m and 9.60 × 6.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Nanolumens Nixel 9 Flex resolves finer: 11,022 pixels per square metre against 10,000 for Unilumin Usurface III 10 (1200×1200), 10% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 800 px across versus 960 px.
Nanolumens Nixel 9 Flex is the lighter rig: 27 kg/m² against 49 kg/m². Across this wall that is 1,754 kg of difference, 1,190 kg versus 2,944 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Unilumin Usurface III 10 (1200×1200) draws more: 650 W/m² against 450 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 14.6 kW versus 37.4 kW, and 5 versus 15 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Nanolumens Nixel 9 Flex: 1 runs against 2, at 1015 and 36 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 304.8 × 152.4 mm against 1200 × 1200 mm, so 700 tiles versus 40 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 5.4 m for Unilumin Usurface III 10 (1200×1200) against 25.4 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Nanolumens Nixel 9 Flex vs Unilumin Usurface III 10 (1200×1200)

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons