RigPlan.app

Nanolumens Nixel 1.87 Flex vs Philips (PPDS) 27HDL5118IP

1.875 mm against 1.875 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Nanolumens Nixel 1.87 FlexPhilips (PPDS) 27HDL5118IP
ManufacturerNanolumensPhilips (PPDS)
Pixel pitch1.875 mm1.875 mm
Cabinet300 × 168.8 mm600 × 337.5 mm
Brightness800 nits600 nits
Refresh ratenot published3,840 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 160°160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet160 × 90320 × 180
Pixels per m²284,360284,444
Weight1.26 kg (25 kg/m²)4.7 kg (23 kg/m²)
Max power40.9 W (808 W/m²)65 W (321 W/m²)
Typical power13.6 W30 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Nanolumens Nixel 1.87 FlexPhilips (PPDS) 27HDL5118IP
Wall built27 × 30, 8.10 × 5.06 m13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m
Panels needed810 + 41 spare169 + 9 spare
Resolution4,320 × 2,700 px4,160 × 2,340 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,361 kg959 kg
Load per point~544 kg across 3~384 kg across 3
Power, full white33.1 kW11 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)145
Data runs27 at ≤36/port26 at ≤9/port
Truck, linear30 m7.3 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.10 × 5.06 m and 7.80 × 4.39 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons