RigPlan.app

Nanolumens Nixel 1.56 Flex vs Philips (PPDS) 27HDL3015IP

1.5625 mm against 1.5625 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Nanolumens Nixel 1.56 FlexPhilips (PPDS) 27HDL3015IP
ManufacturerNanolumensPhilips (PPDS)
Pixel pitch1.5625 mm1.5625 mm
Cabinet300 × 168.8 mm600 × 337.5 mm
Brightness750 nits600 nits
Refresh ratenot published3,840 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 160°160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet192 × 108384 × 216
Pixels per m²409,479409,600
Weight1.26 kg (25 kg/m²)4 kg (20 kg/m²)
Max power37 W (731 W/m²)57 W (281 W/m²)
Typical power11.1 W19 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Nanolumens Nixel 1.56 FlexPhilips (PPDS) 27HDL3015IP
Wall built27 × 30, 8.10 × 5.06 m13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m
Panels needed810 + 41 spare169 + 9 spare
Resolution5,184 × 3,240 px4,992 × 2,808 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,361 kg841 kg
Load per point~544 kg across 3~336 kg across 3
Power, full white30 kW9.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)145
Data runs54 at ≤25/port39 at ≤6/port
Truck, linear30.6 m7.5 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.10 × 5.06 m and 7.80 × 4.39 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons