RigPlan.app

Nanolumens Nixel 0.93 Flex vs Philips (PPDS) 27HDL3093IP

0.9375 mm against 0.9375 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Nanolumens Nixel 0.93 FlexPhilips (PPDS) 27HDL3093IP
ManufacturerNanolumensPhilips (PPDS)
Pixel pitch0.9375 mm0.9375 mm
Cabinet300 × 168.8 mm600 × 337.5 mm
Brightness1,000 nits600 nits
Refresh ratenot published3,840 Hz
Viewing angle170° / 165°160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet320 × 180640 × 360
Pixels per m²1,137,4411,137,778
Weight2.57 kg (51 kg/m²)4 kg (20 kg/m²)
Max power28.3 W (559 W/m²)65 W (321 W/m²)
Typical power9.8 W22 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Nanolumens Nixel 0.93 FlexPhilips (PPDS) 27HDL3093IP
Wall built27 × 30, 8.10 × 5.06 m13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m
Panels needed810 + 41 spare169 + 9 spare
Resolution8,640 × 5,400 px8,320 × 4,680 px
Weight incl. bumpers2,422 kg841 kg
Load per point~969 kg across 3~336 kg across 3
Power, full white22.9 kW11 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)95
Data runs108 at ≤9/port91 at ≤2/port
Truck, linear31.9 m9 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.10 × 5.06 m and 7.80 × 4.39 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons