RigPlan.app

Nanolumens Engage Pro 0.9 vs Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6400IP 0.94

0.9375 mm against 0.9375 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Nanolumens Engage Pro 0.9Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6400IP 0.94
ManufacturerNanolumensPhilips (PPDS)
Pixel pitch0.9375 mm0.9375 mm
Cabinet600 × 337.5 mm600 × 337.5 mm
Brightness700 nits1,000 nits
Refresh ratenot published7,680 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 160°160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet640 × 360640 × 360
Pixels per m²1,137,7781,137,778
Weight5.1 kg (25 kg/m²)5.2 kg (26 kg/m²)
Max power97 W (479 W/m²)90 W (444 W/m²)
Typical power29 W30 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Nanolumens Engage Pro 0.9Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6400IP 0.94
Wall built13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m
Panels needed169 + 9 spare169 + 9 spare
Resolution8,320 × 4,680 px8,320 × 4,680 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,027 kg1,044 kg
Load per point~411 kg across 3~418 kg across 3
Power, full white16.4 kW15.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)77
Data runs91 at ≤2/port91 at ≤2/port
Truck, linear9 m9 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 7.80 × 4.39 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons