RigPlan.app

Nanolumens Engage 1.8 vs Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6000IP 1.88

1.875 mm against 1.875 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Nanolumens Engage 1.8Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6000IP 1.88
ManufacturerNanolumensPhilips (PPDS)
Pixel pitch1.875 mm1.875 mm
Cabinet600 × 337.5 mm600 × 337.5 mm
Brightness769 nits600 nits
Refresh ratenot published3,840 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 160°145° / 145°
Pixels per cabinet320 × 180320 × 180
Pixels per m²284,444284,444
Weight5.1 kg (25 kg/m²)5.36 kg (26 kg/m²)
Max power109 W (538 W/m²)68 W (336 W/m²)
Typical power45 W23 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Nanolumens Engage 1.8Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6000IP 1.88
Wall built13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m
Panels needed169 + 9 spare169 + 9 spare
Resolution4,160 × 2,340 px4,160 × 2,340 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,027 kg1,071 kg
Load per point~411 kg across 3~428 kg across 3
Power, full white18.4 kW11.5 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)75
Data runs26 at ≤9/port26 at ≤9/port
Truck, linear7.3 m7.3 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 7.80 × 4.39 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons