3 matched panels · 5.714 to 10 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
Hikvision
PixelFLEX
Panels listed
55
10
Pitch range
0.781 to 10 mm
1.2 to 10 mm
Cabinet formats
600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 500×1000, 960×960, 1280×960 mm
608×342, 500×500, 960×960 mm
Weight
17 to 36 kg/m²
30 to 40 kg/m²
Maximum draw
222 to 752 W/m²
452 to 1,200 W/m²
Brightness
600 to 6,000 nits
600 to 10,000 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 55
0 of 10
Typical draw published
55 of 55
0 of 10
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
Hikvision and PixelFLEX overlap on 3 matched pairs between 5.714 and 10 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
Hikvision is the lighter cabinet in 3 of 3 matched pairs, PixelFLEX in 0. Across their lineups that is 17 to 36 kg/m² against 30 to 40 kg/m².
Hikvision draws less at full white in 3 of 3 matched pairs, PixelFLEX in -1, and 1 is within 5%. Lineups: 222 to 752 W/m² against 452 to 1,200 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: Hikvision builds in 600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 500×1000, 960×960, 1280×960 mm; PixelFLEX in 608×342, 500×500, 960×960 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 55 panels by Hikvision and for none of its 10 panels by PixelFLEX; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Typical draw is estimated as a third of the maximum where a sheet publishes no figure: Hikvision for none, PixelFLEX for 10 of 10.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.