3 matched panels · 1.86 to 10 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
Dahua
Unilumin
Panels listed
57
18
Pitch range
0.938 to 10 mm
0.95 to 16.67 mm
Cabinet formats
600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 1000×500, 500×1000, 960×960 mm
609.92×343.08, 500×500, 1200×1200 mm
Weight
19 to 36 kg/m²
24 to 49 kg/m²
Maximum draw
331 to 680 W/m²
382 to 717 W/m²
Brightness
500 to 6,500 nits
600 to 8,000 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 57
10 of 18
Typical draw published
57 of 57
18 of 18
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
Dahua and Unilumin overlap on 3 matched pairs between 1.86 and 10 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
Dahua is the lighter cabinet in 3 of 3 matched pairs, Unilumin in 0. Across their lineups that is 19 to 36 kg/m² against 24 to 49 kg/m².
Dahua draws less at full white in 3 of 3 matched pairs, Unilumin in 0. Lineups: 331 to 680 W/m² against 382 to 717 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: Dahua builds in 600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 1000×500, 500×1000, 960×960 mm; Unilumin in 609.92×343.08, 500×500, 1200×1200 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 57 panels by Dahua and for 10 of its 18 panels by Unilumin; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.