3 matched panels · 5.714 to 10 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
Dahua
PixelFLEX
Panels listed
57
10
Pitch range
0.938 to 10 mm
1.2 to 10 mm
Cabinet formats
600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 1000×500, 500×1000, 960×960 mm
608×342, 500×500, 960×960 mm
Weight
19 to 36 kg/m²
30 to 40 kg/m²
Maximum draw
331 to 680 W/m²
452 to 1,200 W/m²
Brightness
500 to 6,500 nits
600 to 10,000 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 57
0 of 10
Typical draw published
57 of 57
0 of 10
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
Dahua and PixelFLEX overlap on 3 matched pairs between 5.714 and 10 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
Weight per square metre is within 5% in every matched pair, so the rigging plot looks the same either way.
Dahua draws less at full white in 3 of 3 matched pairs, PixelFLEX in 0. Lineups: 331 to 680 W/m² against 452 to 1,200 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: Dahua builds in 600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 1000×500, 500×1000, 960×960 mm; PixelFLEX in 608×342, 500×500, 960×960 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 57 panels by Dahua and for none of its 10 panels by PixelFLEX; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Typical draw is estimated as a third of the maximum where a sheet publishes no figure: Dahua for none, PixelFLEX for 10 of 10.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.