5 matched panels · 1.25 to 1.25 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
Dahua
LG
Panels listed
57
16
Pitch range
0.938 to 10 mm
0.78 to 2.5 mm
Cabinet formats
600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 1000×500, 500×1000, 960×960 mm
600×337.5, 1200×675 mm
Weight
19 to 36 kg/m²
25 to 39 kg/m²
Maximum draw
331 to 680 W/m²
346 to 741 W/m²
Brightness
500 to 6,500 nits
600 to 1,000 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 57
0 of 16
Typical draw published
57 of 57
16 of 16
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
Dahua and LG overlap on 5 matched pairs between 1.25 and 1.25 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
Dahua is the lighter cabinet in 4 of 5 matched pairs, LG in 1. Across their lineups that is 19 to 36 kg/m² against 25 to 39 kg/m².
Dahua draws less at full white in 5 of 5 matched pairs, LG in 0. Lineups: 331 to 680 W/m² against 346 to 741 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: Dahua builds in 600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 1000×500, 500×1000, 960×960 mm; LG in 600×337.5, 1200×675 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 57 panels by Dahua and for none of its 16 panels by LG; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.