6 matched panels · 2.604 to 2.604 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
AET
ROE Visual
Panels listed
45
19
Pitch range
0.938 to 4.808 mm
1.56 to 8.9 mm
Cabinet formats
480×270, 600×337.5, 500×500, 480×540, 500×1000, 960×540 mm
500×500, 500×1000, 600×1200, 1000×1000 mm
Weight
21 to 54 kg/m²
9 to 37 kg/m²
Maximum draw
400 to 680 W/m²
420 to 960 W/m²
Brightness
550 to 5,500 nits
800 to 6,000 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 45
19 of 19
Typical draw published
45 of 45
19 of 19
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
AET and ROE Visual overlap on 6 matched pairs between 2.604 and 2.604 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
AET is the lighter cabinet in 3 of 6 matched pairs, ROE Visual in 3. Across their lineups that is 21 to 54 kg/m² against 9 to 37 kg/m².
AET draws less at full white in 5 of 6 matched pairs, ROE Visual in 1. Lineups: 400 to 680 W/m² against 420 to 960 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: AET builds in 480×270, 600×337.5, 500×500, 480×540, 500×1000, 960×540 mm; ROE Visual in 500×500, 500×1000, 600×1200, 1000×1000 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 45 panels by AET and for every one of its 19 panels by ROE Visual; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.