ADJ vs ROE Visual
7 matched panels · 3.84 to 3.91 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
| ADJ | ROE Visual |
|---|
| Panels listed | 7 | 19 |
| Pitch range | 2.97 to 6 mm | 1.56 to 8.9 mm |
| Cabinet formats | 500×500, 576×576 mm | 500×500, 500×1000, 600×1200, 1000×1000 mm |
| Weight | 27 to 36 kg/m² | 9 to 37 kg/m² |
| Maximum draw | 633 to 904 W/m² | 420 to 960 W/m² |
| Brightness | 1,000 to 4,500 nits | 800 to 6,000 nits |
| Hang limit published | 7 of 7 | 19 of 19 |
| Typical draw published | 7 of 7 | 19 of 19 |
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
- ADJ and ROE Visual overlap on 7 matched pairs between 3.84 and 3.91 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
- ADJ is the lighter cabinet in 1 of 7 matched pairs, ROE Visual in 5, and 1 is within 5%. Across their lineups that is 27 to 36 kg/m² against 9 to 37 kg/m².
- ADJ draws less at full white in 1 of 7 matched pairs, ROE Visual in 4, and 2 are within 5%. Lineups: 633 to 904 W/m² against 420 to 960 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
- Cabinet formats: ADJ builds in 500×500, 576×576 mm; ROE Visual in 500×500, 500×1000, 600×1200, 1000×1000 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
- A hanging limit is published for every one of its 7 panels by ADJ and for every one of its 19 panels by ROE Visual; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
- Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.
More