29 matched panels · 1.56 to 8.9 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
Absen
ROE Visual
Panels listed
57
19
Pitch range
0.78 to 8.9 mm
1.56 to 8.9 mm
Cabinet formats
250×500, 240×540, 600×337.5, 500×500, 500×1000, 1000×500, 960×540, 1000×1000 mm
500×500, 500×1000, 600×1200, 1000×1000 mm
Weight
19 to 38 kg/m²
9 to 37 kg/m²
Maximum draw
326 to 800 W/m²
420 to 960 W/m²
Brightness
800 to 5,500 nits
800 to 6,000 nits
Hang limit published
42 of 57
19 of 19
Typical draw published
57 of 57
19 of 19
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
Absen and ROE Visual overlap on 29 matched pairs between 1.56 and 8.9 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
Absen is the lighter cabinet in 19 of 29 matched pairs, ROE Visual in 5, and 5 are within 5%. Across their lineups that is 19 to 38 kg/m² against 9 to 37 kg/m².
Absen draws less at full white in 25 of 29 matched pairs, ROE Visual in 3, and 1 is within 5%. Lineups: 326 to 800 W/m² against 420 to 960 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: Absen builds in 250×500, 240×540, 600×337.5, 500×500, 500×1000, 1000×500, 960×540, 1000×1000 mm; ROE Visual in 500×500, 500×1000, 600×1200, 1000×1000 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for 42 of its 57 panels by Absen and for every one of its 19 panels by ROE Visual; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.