RigPlan

Leyard CLI2.6 vs ROE Visual DM2.6

2.6 mm against 2.6 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Leyard CLI2.6ROE Visual DM2.6
ManufacturerLeyardROE Visual
Pixel pitch2.6 mm2.6 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness1,000 nits1,500 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz1,920 Hz
Viewing angle140° / 140°140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet192 × 192192 × 192
Pixels per m²147,456147,456
Weight4.1 kg (16 kg/m²)5.76 kg (23 kg/m²)
Max power300 W (1200 W/m²)180 W (720 W/m²)
Typical power150 W90 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Leyard CLI2.6ROE Visual DM2.6
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution3,072 × 1,728 px3,072 × 1,728 px
Weight incl. bumpers790 kg898 kg
Load per point~316 kg across 3~359 kg across 3
Power, full white43.2 kW25.9 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)169
Data runs16 at ≤14/port16 at ≤14/port
Truck, linear6 m6 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons