INFiLED ORAMT5.95 vs Nanolumens Performance 250 5.9

5.95 mm against 5.952 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Specifications

	INFiLED ORAMT5.95	Nanolumens Performance 250 5.9
Manufacturer	INFiLED	Nanolumens
Pixel pitch	5.95 mm	5.952 mm
Cabinet	1000 × 1000 mm	250 × 250 mm
Brightness	5,000 nits	5,500 nits
Refresh rate	7,680 Hz	not published
Viewing angle	160° / 160°	140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet	168 × 168	42 × 42
Pixels per m²	28,224	28,224
Weight	20.4 kg (20 kg/m²)	2.33 kg (37 kg/m²)
Max power	720 W (720 W/m²)	41.3 W (661 W/m²)
Typical power	240 W	12.4 W
Max hang	not published	not published

The same wall, built from each closest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	INFiLED ORAMT5.95	Nanolumens Performance 250 5.9
Wall built	8 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m	32 × 18, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed	40 + 2 spare	576 + 29 spare
Resolution	1,344 × 840 px	1,344 × 756 px
Weight incl. bumpers	916 kg	1,742 kg
Load per point	~366 kg across 3	~697 kg across 3
Power, full white	28.8 kW	23.8 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	10	11
Data runs	3 at ≤18/port	2 at ≤294/port
Truck, linear	2.5 m	21.3 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density (28,224 and 28,224 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
INFiLED ORAMT5.95 is the lighter rig: 20 kg/m² against 37 kg/m². Across this wall that is 826 kg of difference, 916 kg versus 1,742 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
INFiLED ORAMT5.95 draws more: 720 W/m² against 661 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 28.8 kW versus 23.8 kW, and 10 versus 11 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Nanolumens Performance 250 5.9: 2 runs against 3, at 18 and 294 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 1000 × 1000 mm against 250 × 250 mm, so 40 tiles versus 576 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 2.5 m for INFiLED ORAMT5.95 against 21.3 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

For other panels, or your own OEM tile, the comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

INFiLED ORAMT5.95 vs Nanolumens Performance 250 5.9

Specifications

The same wall, built from each closest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons