Gloshine Vanish VA8.93 vs ROE Visual Vanish V8S

8.93 mm against 8.9 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 5.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (12,544 and 12,544 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• ROE Visual Vanish V8S is the lighter rig: 9 kg/m² against 16 kg/m². Across this wall that is 214 kg of difference, 476 kg versus 690 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• ROE Visual Vanish V8S draws more: 440 W/m² against 360 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 13 kW versus 17.6 kW, and 8 versus 8 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 1 data runs for this wall, though they carry 82 and 41 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 1000 × 500 mm against 1000 × 1000 mm, so 72 tiles versus 40 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 2.5 m for ROE Visual Vanish V8S against 4 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Gloshine Vanish VA8.93: specs and calculator
• ROE Visual Vanish V8S: specs and calculator
• All Gloshine panels
• All ROE Visual panels

Related comparisons

• Absen JP8 Pro vs ROE Visual V8S
• Gloshine VA mini 8.93 vs ROE Visual V8S
• Gloshine VA8.93 vs ROE Visual V8T
• Absen JP8 Pro vs Gloshine VA8.93