RigPlan

Gloshine DN1.9 vs ROE Visual RB1.9B

1.95 mm against 1.95 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Gloshine DN1.9ROE Visual RB1.9B
ManufacturerGloshineROE Visual
Pixel pitch1.95 mm1.95 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness800 nits1,500 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz7,680 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 140°140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet256 × 256256 × 256
Pixels per m²262,144262,144
Weight7 kg (28 kg/m²)8.8 kg (35 kg/m²)
Max power145 W (580 W/m²)160 W (640 W/m²)
Typical power73 W80 W
Max hang20 panels20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Gloshine DN1.9ROE Visual RB1.9B
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution4,096 × 2,304 px4,096 × 2,304 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,208 kg1,348 kg
Load per point~483 kg across 3~539 kg across 3
Power, full white20.9 kW23 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)88
Data runs32 at ≤7/port32 at ≤7/port
Truck, linear6.5 m6.5 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons