Desay X3.9 vs ProLights SigmaPix 39T1X2BF

3.906 mm against 3.906 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 5.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (65,536 and 65,536 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• ProLights SigmaPix 39T1X2BF is the lighter rig: 29 kg/m² against 42 kg/m². Across this wall that is 344 kg of difference, 1,368 kg versus 1,712 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• ProLights SigmaPix 39T1X2BF draws more: 840 W/m² against 640 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 23 kW versus 33.6 kW, and 8 versus 15 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 6 data runs for this wall, though they carry 31 and 15 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 500 × 500 mm against 500 × 1000 mm, so 144 tiles versus 80 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• Desay X3.9: specs and calculator
• ProLights SigmaPix 39T1X2BF: specs and calculator
• All Desay panels
• All ProLights panels

Related comparisons

• Desay X3.9 vs Nanolumens Performance 500 3.9
• Desay X3.9 vs SiliconCore Tulip 3.9 Outdoor
• Desay X3.9 vs Digital Projection RCS-G 3.9 Large
• Desay X3.9 vs Digital Projection RCS-G 3.9 Medium
• Desay X3.9 vs Digital Projection RCS-C 3.9 Large
• Desay X3.9 vs Digital Projection RCS-C 3.9 Medium