RigPlan.app

Desay X3.9 vs LEDitgo rX3ioBF

3.906 mm against 3.906 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Desay X3.9LEDitgo rX3ioBF
ManufacturerDesayLEDitgo
Pixel pitch3.906 mm3.906 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness5,000 nits5,000 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 100°170° / 170°
Pixels per cabinet128 × 128128 × 128
Pixels per m²65,53665,536
Weight10.5 kg (42 kg/m²)9.7 kg (39 kg/m²)
Max power160 W (640 W/m²)190 W (760 W/m²)
Typical power56 W80 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Desay X3.9LEDitgo rX3ioBF
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution2,048 × 1,152 px2,048 × 1,152 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,712 kg1,597 kg
Load per point~685 kg across 3~639 kg across 3
Power, full white23 kW27.4 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)816
Data runs6 at ≤31/port6 at ≤31/port
Truck, linear5.8 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons