RigPlan.app

Desay X2.9i vs Blizzard IRiS InSignia 2.9

2.976 mm against 2.976 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Desay X2.9iBlizzard IRiS InSignia 2.9
ManufacturerDesayBlizzard IRiS
Pixel pitch2.976 mm2.976 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness1,500 nits800 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 140°not published
Pixels per cabinet168 × 168168 × 168
Pixels per m²112,896112,896
Weight10 kg (40 kg/m²)5.8 kg (23 kg/m²)
Max power155 W (620 W/m²)150 W (600 W/m²)
Typical power54 W50 W*
Max hangnot publishednot published

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Desay X2.9iBlizzard IRiS InSignia 2.9
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution2,688 × 1,512 px2,688 × 1,512 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,640 kg1,035 kg
Load per point~656 kg across 3~414 kg across 3
Power, full white22.3 kW21.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)88
Data runs8 at ≤18/port8 at ≤18/port
Truck, linear5.8 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons