AET KL14AC52 vs Sharp LD-D151

1.5 mm against 1.5 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.16 × 4.59 m and 7.90 × 4.45 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• AET KL14AC52 resolves finer: 444,444 pixels per square metre against 398,892 for Sharp LD-D151, 11% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 5,440 px across versus 4,992 px.
• AET KL14AC52 is the lighter rig: 26 kg/m² against 34 kg/m². Across this wall that is 150 kg of difference, 1,198 kg versus 1,348 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• AET KL14AC52 draws more: 448 W/m² against 313 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 16.8 kW versus 11 kW, and 9 versus 5 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on AET KL14AC52: 34 runs against 39, at 9 and 6 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 480 × 270 mm against 608 × 342 mm, so 289 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 7.5 m for Sharp LD-D151 against 11.9 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• AET KL14AC52: specs and calculator
• Sharp LD-D151: specs and calculator
• All AET panels
• All Sharp panels

Related comparisons

• Samsung IF015H vs Sharp LD-D151
• Barco XT1.5-E vs Sharp LD-D151
• Leyard CLI1.5 vs Sharp LD-D151
• Esdlumen (LianTronics) Pilot Pro 1.5 vs Sharp LD-D151
• PixelFLEX FLEXUltra XT 1.5 vs Sharp LD-D151
• Planar TVF014 vs Sharp LD-D151