ADJ VS3IP vs Desay M3

3.84 mm against 3.846 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.06 × 4.61 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (67,817 and 67,600 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Weight is close: 27 kg/m² for ADJ VS3IP against 28 kg/m² for Desay M3, so the rigging plot looks much the same either way.
• Power is close: 633 W/m² for ADJ VS3IP against 640 W/m² for Desay M3 at full white, giving 8 and 10 circuits respectively for this wall.
• Data is lighter on Desay M3: 5 runs against 7, at 23 and 10 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 576 × 576 mm against 800 × 900 mm, so 112 tiles versus 50 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 2.9 m for Desay M3 against 4.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• ADJ VS3IP: specs and calculator
• Desay M3: specs and calculator
• All ADJ panels
• All Desay panels

Related comparisons

• ADJ VS3IP vs ROE Visual CB3 MkII
• Desay M3 vs ROE Visual CB3 MkII
• Absen PL3.9 Pro V10 vs Desay M3
• Absen PL3.9 V10 vs Desay M3
• Absen PL3.9 Pro V10 vs ADJ VS3IP
• Absen PL3.9 V10 vs ADJ VS3IP