Absen SA3.9 1000×500 vs Sharp LED-Q039e2

3.9 mm against 3.9 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (65,536 and 65,536 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Absen SA3.9 1000×500 is the lighter rig: 19 kg/m² against 34 kg/m². Across this wall that is 640 kg of difference, 784 kg versus 1,424 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Sharp LED-Q039e2 draws more: 640 W/m² against 450 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 16.2 kW versus 23 kW, and 8 versus 8 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on Sharp LED-Q039e2: 6 runs against 8, at 15 and 31 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 1000 × 500 mm against 500 × 500 mm, so 72 tiles versus 144 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 4 m for Absen SA3.9 1000×500 against 5.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Absen SA3.9 1000×500: specs and calculator
• Sharp LED-Q039e2: specs and calculator
• All Absen panels
• All Sharp panels

Related comparisons

• Absen PL3.9 Pro V10 vs Sharp LED-Q039e2
• Absen PL3.9 V10 vs Sharp LED-Q039e2
• Absen PL3.9 XL V10 vs Sharp LED-Q039e2
• Absen PL3.9 Pro V2 vs Sharp LED-Q039e2
• Absen PL3.9 Plus V2 vs Sharp LED-Q039e2
• Absen PL3.9B Plus V2 vs Sharp LED-Q039e2