RigPlan.app

Absen PL2.5 Pro V10 vs AET QC 2.5 (500×1000)

2.5 mm against 2.5 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Absen PL2.5 Pro V10AET QC 2.5 (500×1000)
ManufacturerAbsenAET
Pixel pitch2.5 mm2.5 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 1000 mm
Brightness1,500 nits550 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 140°140° / 120°
Pixels per cabinet200 × 200200 × 400
Pixels per m²160,000160,000
Weight8.8 kg (35 kg/m²)14 kg (28 kg/m²)
Max power170 W (680 W/m²)200 W (400 W/m²)
Typical power58 W60 W
Max hang20 panelsnot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Absen PL2.5 Pro V10AET QC 2.5 (500×1000)
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare80 + 4 spare
Resolution3,200 × 1,800 px3,200 × 2,000 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,467 kg1,320 kg
Load per point~587 kg across 3~528 kg across 3
Power, full white24.5 kW16 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)98
Data runs16 at ≤13/port16 at ≤6/port
Truck, linear6 m6 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 5.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons