RigPlan.app

Absen PL2.5 Plus V2 vs Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 2.5

2.5 mm against 2.5 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Absen PL2.5 Plus V2Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 2.5
ManufacturerAbsenBlizzard IRiS
Pixel pitch2.5 mm2.5 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm1200 × 300 mm
Brightness1,200 nits1,000 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle140° / 140°not published
Pixels per cabinet200 × 200480 × 120
Pixels per m²160,000160,000
Weight7.8 kg (31 kg/m²)10 kg (28 kg/m²)
Max power160 W (640 W/m²)175 W (486 W/m²)
Typical power54 W58 W*
Max hangnot publishednot published

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Absen PL2.5 Plus V2Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 2.5
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m6 × 15, 7.20 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare90 + 5 spare
Resolution3,200 × 1,800 px2,880 × 1,800 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,323 kg975 kg
Load per point~529 kg across 3~390 kg across 3
Power, full white23 kW15.8 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)86
Data runs16 at ≤13/port12 at ≤9/port
Truck, linear6 m6.7 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 7.20 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons