RigPlan.app

Absen NX2.5 (960×540) vs INFiLED IRGX2.5mk2 mini

2.5 mm against 2.5 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Absen NX2.5 (960×540)INFiLED IRGX2.5mk2 mini
ManufacturerAbsenINFiLED
Pixel pitch2.5 mm2.5 mm
Cabinet960 × 540 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness800 nits1,000 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 160°160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet384 × 216200 × 200
Pixels per m²160,000160,000
Weight10.4 kg (20 kg/m²)8.2 kg (33 kg/m²)
Max power218 W (421 W/m²)150 W (600 W/m²)
Typical power73 W50 W
Max hang12 panelsnot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Absen NX2.5 (960×540)INFiLED IRGX2.5mk2 mini
Wall built8 × 8, 7.68 × 4.32 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed64 + 4 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution3,072 × 1,728 px3,200 × 1,800 px
Weight incl. bumpers766 kg1,381 kg
Load per point~306 kg across 3~552 kg across 3
Power, full white14 kW21.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)88
Data runs16 at ≤6/port16 at ≤13/port
Truck, linear5 m6 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.68 × 4.32 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons