RigPlan.app

Absen NX1.8 (960×540) vs Philips (PPDS) 27HDL3118IP

1.87 mm against 1.875 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Absen NX1.8 (960×540)Philips (PPDS) 27HDL3118IP
ManufacturerAbsenPhilips (PPDS)
Pixel pitch1.87 mm1.875 mm
Cabinet960 × 540 mm600 × 337.5 mm
Brightness800 nits1,000 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz7,680 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 160°160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet512 × 288320 × 180
Pixels per m²284,444284,444
Weight10.5 kg (20 kg/m²)4 kg (20 kg/m²)
Max power233 W (449 W/m²)92 W (454 W/m²)
Typical power78 W30 W
Max hang12 panelsnot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Absen NX1.8 (960×540)Philips (PPDS) 27HDL3118IP
Wall built8 × 8, 7.68 × 4.32 m13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m
Panels needed64 + 4 spare169 + 9 spare
Resolution4,096 × 2,304 px4,160 × 2,340 px
Weight incl. bumpers772 kg841 kg
Load per point~309 kg across 3~336 kg across 3
Power, full white14.9 kW15.5 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)87
Data runs24 at ≤3/port26 at ≤9/port
Truck, linear5.2 m7.3 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.68 × 4.32 m and 7.80 × 4.39 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons