Absen CL1.2 V3 vs AET Koala KL12AC52

1.25 mm against 1.25 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 8.16 × 4.59 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (640,000 and 640,000 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Absen CL1.2 V3 is the lighter rig: 22 kg/m² against 26 kg/m². Across this wall that is 289 kg of difference, 909 kg versus 1,198 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• AET Koala KL12AC52 draws more: 448 W/m² against 400 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 13.7 kW versus 16.8 kW, and 7 versus 9 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on AET Koala KL12AC52: 51 runs against 52, at 4 and 6 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 600 × 337.5 mm against 480 × 270 mm, so 169 tiles versus 289 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 8.1 m for Absen CL1.2 V3 against 12.3 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Absen CL1.2 V3: specs and calculator
• AET Koala KL12AC52: specs and calculator
• All Absen panels
• All AET panels

Related comparisons

• Absen CL1.2 V3 vs LG LSCB012
• Absen CL1.2 V3 vs Desay X1.2i
• Absen CL1.2 V3 vs LG LSCC012
• Absen CL1.2 V3 vs LG LSCD012
• Absen CL1.2 V3 vs LG LSBF012
• Absen CL1.2 V3 vs LG LSAP012