Absen CL0.9 V3 vs Nanolumens Nixel 0.93 Flex

0.9375 mm against 0.9375 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Absen CL0.9 V3	Nanolumens Nixel 0.93 Flex
Manufacturer	Absen	Nanolumens
Pixel pitch	0.9375 mm	0.9375 mm
Cabinet	600 × 337.5 mm	300 × 168.8 mm
Brightness	1,200 nits	1,000 nits
Refresh rate	7,680 Hz	not published
Viewing angle	160° / 160°	170° / 165°
Pixels per cabinet	640 × 360	320 × 180
Pixels per m²	1,137,778	1,137,441
Weight	4.4 kg (22 kg/m²)	2.57 kg (51 kg/m²)
Max power	86 W (425 W/m²)	28.3 W (559 W/m²)
Typical power	29 W	9.8 W
Max hang	15 panels	not published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Absen CL0.9 V3	Nanolumens Nixel 0.93 Flex
Wall built	13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m	27 × 30, 8.10 × 5.06 m
Panels needed	169 + 9 spare	810 + 41 spare
Resolution	8,320 × 4,680 px	8,640 × 5,400 px
Weight incl. bumpers	909 kg	2,422 kg
Load per point	~363 kg across 3	~969 kg across 3
Power, full white	14.5 kW	22.9 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	7	9
Data runs	91 at ≤2/port	108 at ≤9/port
Truck, linear	9 m	31.9 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 8.10 × 5.06 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density (1,137,778 and 1,137,441 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
Absen CL0.9 V3 is the lighter rig: 22 kg/m² against 51 kg/m². Across this wall that is 1,513 kg of difference, 909 kg versus 2,422 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Nanolumens Nixel 0.93 Flex draws more: 559 W/m² against 425 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 14.5 kW versus 22.9 kW, and 7 versus 9 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Absen CL0.9 V3: 91 runs against 108, at 2 and 9 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 600 × 337.5 mm against 300 × 168.8 mm, so 169 tiles versus 810 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 9 m for Absen CL0.9 V3 against 31.9 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Absen CL0.9 V3 vs Nanolumens Nixel 0.93 Flex

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons