Absen KLCOB0.7 V2 vs Samsung IW008A

0.78 mm against 0.84 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Absen KLCOB0.7 V2	Samsung IW008A
Manufacturer	Absen	Samsung
Pixel pitch	0.78 mm	0.84 mm
Cabinet	600 × 337.5 mm	806.4 × 453.6 mm
Brightness	800 nits	500 nits
Refresh rate	3,840 Hz	11,520 Hz
Viewing angle	160° / 160°	170° / 155°
Pixels per cabinet	768 × 432	960 × 540
Pixels per m²	1,638,400	1,417,234
Weight	4.6 kg (23 kg/m²)	11.2 kg (31 kg/m²)
Max power	91 W (449 W/m²)	140 W (383 W/m²)
Typical power	30 W	95 W
Max hang	15 panels	not published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Absen KLCOB0.7 V2	Samsung IW008A
Wall built	13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m	10 × 10, 8.06 × 4.54 m
Panels needed	169 + 9 spare	100 + 5 spare
Resolution	9,984 × 5,616 px	9,600 × 5,400 px
Weight incl. bumpers	942 kg	1,245 kg
Load per point	~377 kg across 3	~498 kg across 3
Power, full white	15.4 kW	14 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	7	5
Data runs	169 at ≤1/port	100 at ≤1/port
Truck, linear	10.8 m	9.4 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 8.06 × 4.54 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Absen KLCOB0.7 V2 resolves finer: 1,638,400 pixels per square metre against 1,417,234 for Samsung IW008A, 16% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 9,984 px across versus 9,600 px.
Absen KLCOB0.7 V2 is the lighter rig: 23 kg/m² against 31 kg/m². Across this wall that is 303 kg of difference, 942 kg versus 1,245 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Absen KLCOB0.7 V2 draws more: 449 W/m² against 383 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 15.4 kW versus 14 kW, and 7 versus 5 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Samsung IW008A: 100 runs against 169, at 1 and 1 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 600 × 337.5 mm against 806.4 × 453.6 mm, so 169 tiles versus 100 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 9.4 m for Samsung IW008A against 10.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Absen KLCOB0.7 V2 vs Samsung IW008A

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons