LG LSAP007 vs Samsung IW008A

0.78 mm against 0.84 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 8.06 × 4.54 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• LG LSAP007 resolves finer: 1,638,400 pixels per square metre against 1,417,234 for Samsung IW008A, 16% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 9,984 px across versus 9,600 px.
• Samsung IW008A is the lighter rig: 31 kg/m² against 39 kg/m². Across this wall that is 238 kg of difference, 1,245 kg versus 1,483 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Samsung IW008A draws more: 383 W/m² against 346 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 11.8 kW versus 14 kW, and 5 versus 5 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on Samsung IW008A: 100 runs against 169, at 1 and 1 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 600 × 337.5 mm against 806.4 × 453.6 mm, so 169 tiles versus 100 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 9.4 m for Samsung IW008A against 10.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• LG LSAP007: specs and calculator
• Samsung IW008A: specs and calculator
• All LG panels
• All Samsung panels

Related comparisons

• LG LSAP007 vs Samsung IW008C
• Absen KLCOB0.7 V2 vs Samsung IW008A
• Samsung IW008A vs Sharp LD-FE093
• Absen KLCOB0.7 V2 vs LG LSAP007
• Christie MicroTiles LED 0.75 mm Series 60 vs LG LSAP007