Planar TVF009 vs Sharp LD-D091

0.945 mm against 0.9 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.86 × 4.42 m and 7.90 × 4.45 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (1,119,789 and 1,108,033 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Planar TVF009 is the lighter rig: 26 kg/m² against 34 kg/m². Across this wall that is 279 kg of difference, 1,069 kg versus 1,348 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Planar TVF009 draws more: 598 W/m² against 289 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 20.8 kW versus 10.1 kW, and 13 versus 5 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 91 data runs for this wall, though they carry 2 and 2 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 604.8 × 340.2 mm against 608 × 342 mm, so 169 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• Planar TVF009: specs and calculator
• Sharp LD-D091: specs and calculator
• All Planar panels
• All Sharp panels

Related comparisons

• Absen CL0.9 V3 vs Planar TVF009
• Absen KLCOB0.9 V2 vs Sharp LD-D091
• Absen KLCOB0.9 Pro V2 vs Sharp LD-D091
• Absen CL0.9 V3 vs Sharp LD-D091
• Planar TVF009 vs Samsung IW009B
• Planar TVF009 vs Unilumin UpanelS 0.9