RigPlan.app

Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6400IP 0.94 vs Samsung IW009B

0.9375 mm against 0.945 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6400IP 0.94Samsung IW009B
ManufacturerPhilips (PPDS)Samsung
Pixel pitch0.9375 mm0.945 mm
Cabinet600 × 337.5 mm1209.6 × 680.4 mm
Brightness1,000 nits600 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz11,520 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 160°160° / 150°
Pixels per cabinet640 × 3601280 × 720
Pixels per m²1,137,7781,119,789
Weight5.2 kg (26 kg/m²)22.1 kg (27 kg/m²)
Max power90 W (444 W/m²)264 W (321 W/m²)
Typical power30 W161 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6400IP 0.94Samsung IW009B
Wall built13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m7 × 7, 8.47 × 4.76 m
Panels needed169 + 9 spare49 + 3 spare
Resolution8,320 × 4,680 px8,960 × 5,040 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,044 kg1,173 kg
Load per point~418 kg across 3~469 kg across 3
Power, full white15.2 kW12.9 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)77
Data runs91 at ≤2/port49 at ≤1/port
Truck, linear9 m7.9 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 8.47 × 4.76 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons