Samsung IW009B vs Unilumin UpanelS 0.9

0.945 mm against 0.95 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.47 × 4.76 m and 7.93 × 4.46 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (1,119,789 and 1,101,068 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Samsung IW009B is the lighter rig: 27 kg/m² against 36 kg/m². Across this wall that is 260 kg of difference, 1,173 kg versus 1,433 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Unilumin UpanelS 0.9 draws more: 717 W/m² against 321 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 12.9 kW versus 25.4 kW, and 7 versus 13 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on Samsung IW009B: 49 runs against 91, at 1 and 2 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 1209.6 × 680.4 mm against 609.92 × 343.08 mm, so 49 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 7.9 m for Samsung IW009B against 9 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Samsung IW009B: specs and calculator
• Unilumin UpanelS 0.9: specs and calculator
• All Samsung panels
• All Unilumin panels

Related comparisons

• Absen CL0.9 V3 vs Samsung IW009B
• Barco TP0.9-I vs Unilumin UpanelS 0.9
• Barco TP0.9-Q vs Unilumin UpanelS 0.9
• Samsung IW009B vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 0.9
• Planar TVF009 vs Samsung IW009B
• Planar DLPro 0.9M20 vs Samsung IW009B