Absen KLCOB0.9 V2 vs Planar TVF009

0.93 mm against 0.945 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 7.86 × 4.42 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (1,137,778 and 1,119,789 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Absen KLCOB0.9 V2 is the lighter rig: 22 kg/m² against 26 kg/m². Across this wall that is 160 kg of difference, 909 kg versus 1,069 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Planar TVF009 draws more: 598 W/m² against 395 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 13.5 kW versus 20.8 kW, and 7 versus 13 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 91 data runs for this wall, though they carry 2 and 2 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 600 × 337.5 mm against 604.8 × 340.2 mm, so 169 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• Absen KLCOB0.9 V2: specs and calculator
• Planar TVF009: specs and calculator
• All Absen panels
• All Planar panels

Related comparisons

• Absen KLCOB0.9 V2 vs Sharp LD-FE093
• Absen KLCOB0.9 V2 vs Sharp LD-D091
• Absen KLCOB0.9 V2 vs Sharp LD-EC091
• Planar TVF009 vs Samsung IW009B
• Planar TVF009 vs Unilumin UpanelS 0.9
• Planar TVF009 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 0.9