Samsung IW008C vs Sharp LD-FE093

0.84 mm against 0.9 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.06 × 4.54 m and 7.90 × 4.45 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Samsung IW008C resolves finer: 1,417,234 pixels per square metre against 1,108,033 for Sharp LD-FE093, 28% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 9,600 px across versus 8,320 px.
• Samsung IW008C is the lighter rig: 31 kg/m² against 42 kg/m². Across this wall that is 387 kg of difference, 1,265 kg versus 1,652 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Samsung IW008C draws more: 355 W/m² against 168 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 13 kW versus 5.9 kW, and 5 versus 3 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on Sharp LD-FE093: 91 runs against 100, at 1 and 2 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 806.4 × 453.6 mm against 608 × 342 mm, so 100 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 9 m for Sharp LD-FE093 against 9.4 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Samsung IW008C: specs and calculator
• Sharp LD-FE093: specs and calculator
• All Samsung panels
• All Sharp panels

Related comparisons

• Absen KLCOB0.9 V2 vs Sharp LD-FE093
• Absen KLCOB0.9 Pro V2 vs Sharp LD-FE093
• Absen CL0.9 V3 vs Sharp LD-FE093
• LG LSAP007 vs Samsung IW008C
• Absen KLCOB0.7 V2 vs Samsung IW008C
• Samsung IW008A vs Sharp LD-FE093