Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6400IP 1.56 vs ROE Visual RB1.5

1.5625 mm against 1.56 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6400IP 1.56	ROE Visual RB1.5
Manufacturer	Philips (PPDS)	ROE Visual
Pixel pitch	1.5625 mm	1.56 mm
Cabinet	600 × 337.5 mm	500 × 500 mm
Brightness	600 nits	800 nits
Refresh rate	7,680 Hz	3,840 Hz
Viewing angle	160° / 160°	140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet	384 × 216	320 × 320
Pixels per m²	409,600	409,600
Weight	5.2 kg (26 kg/m²)	8.16 kg (33 kg/m²)
Max power	54 W (267 W/m²)	210 W (840 W/m²)
Typical power	18 W	105 W
Max hang	not published	20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6400IP 1.56	ROE Visual RB1.5
Wall built	13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m	16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed	169 + 9 spare	144 + 8 spare
Resolution	4,992 × 2,808 px	5,120 × 2,880 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,044 kg	1,256 kg
Load per point	~418 kg across 3	~502 kg across 3
Power, full white	9.1 kW	30.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	4	16
Data runs	39 at ≤6/port	32 at ≤5/port
Truck, linear	7.5 m	6.5 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density (409,600 and 409,600 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6400IP 1.56 is the lighter rig: 26 kg/m² against 33 kg/m². Across this wall that is 212 kg of difference, 1,044 kg versus 1,256 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
ROE Visual RB1.5 draws more: 840 W/m² against 267 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 9.1 kW versus 30.2 kW, and 4 versus 16 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on ROE Visual RB1.5: 32 runs against 39, at 6 and 5 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 600 × 337.5 mm against 500 × 500 mm, so 169 tiles versus 144 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 6.5 m for ROE Visual RB1.5 against 7.5 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6400IP 1.56 vs ROE Visual RB1.5

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons