Glux TVsn15 vs ROE Visual RB1.5F

1.5625 mm against 1.56 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (409,600 and 409,600 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Glux TVsn15 is the lighter rig: 34 kg/m² against 36 kg/m². Across this wall that is 225 kg of difference, 1,385 kg versus 1,610 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Glux TVsn15 draws more: 1200 W/m² against 960 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 43.2 kW versus 34.6 kW, and 16 versus 16 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 32 data runs for this wall, though they carry 20 and 5 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 250 × 250 mm against 500 × 500 mm, so 576 tiles versus 144 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 6.5 m for ROE Visual RB1.5F against 15.2 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Glux TVsn15: specs and calculator
• ROE Visual RB1.5F: specs and calculator
• All Glux panels
• All ROE Visual panels

Related comparisons

• Absen SA1.5 vs ROE Visual RB1.5F
• INFiLED IRDB1.5mk2 Ultra MT2 vs ROE Visual RB1.5F
• INFiLED IRDB1.56mk2 MT2 CBSF vs ROE Visual RB1.5F
• Glux TVsn15 vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.5
• Glux TVsn15 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.5
• Desay X1.5i vs Glux TVsn15