Glux TVsn15 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.5

1.5625 mm against 1.58 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 7.93 × 4.46 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Glux TVsn15 resolves finer: 409,600 pixels per square metre against 396,385 for Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.5, 3% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 5,120 px across versus 4,992 px.
• Weight is close: 34 kg/m² for Glux TVsn15 against 32 kg/m² for Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.5, so the rigging plot looks much the same either way.
• Glux TVsn15 draws more: 1200 W/m² against 631 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 43.2 kW versus 22.3 kW, and 16 versus 13 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on Glux TVsn15: 32 runs against 39, at 20 and 6 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 250 × 250 mm against 609.92 × 343.08 mm, so 576 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 7.5 m for Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.5 against 15.2 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Glux TVsn15: specs and calculator
• Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.5: specs and calculator
• All Glux panels
• All Unilumin panels

Related comparisons

• Glux TVsn15 vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.5
• Desay X1.5i vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.5
• ROE Visual RB1.5 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.5
• Desay X1.5i vs Glux TVsn15
• Glux TVsn15 vs ROE Visual RB1.5
• Glux TVsn15 vs ROE Visual RB1.5F