RigPlan

Desay X3.9i vs ROE Visual DM3.9

3.906 mm against 3.91 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Desay X3.9iROE Visual DM3.9
ManufacturerDesayROE Visual
Pixel pitch3.906 mm3.91 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness1,500 nits1,500 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz1,920 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 140°140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet128 × 128128 × 128
Pixels per m²65,53665,536
Weight10 kg (40 kg/m²)5.76 kg (23 kg/m²)
Max power150 W (600 W/m²)150 W (600 W/m²)
Typical power53 W75 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Desay X3.9iROE Visual DM3.9
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution2,048 × 1,152 px2,048 × 1,152 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,640 kg898 kg
Load per point~656 kg across 3~359 kg across 3
Power, full white21.6 kW21.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)88
Data runs6 at ≤31/port6 at ≤31/port
Truck, linear5.8 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons