ADJ AV6X vs ROE Visual CB5 MkII

6 mm against 5.77 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	ADJ AV6X	ROE Visual CB5 MkII
Manufacturer	ADJ	ROE Visual
Pixel pitch	6 mm	5.77 mm
Cabinet	576 × 576 mm	600 × 1200 mm
Brightness	1,200 nits	6,000 nits
Refresh rate	1,200 Hz	7,680 Hz
Viewing angle	not published	140° / 110°
Pixels per cabinet	96 × 96	104 × 208
Pixels per m²	27,778	30,044
Weight	10.5 kg (32 kg/m²)	12.2 kg (17 kg/m²)
Max power	300 W (904 W/m²)	480 W (667 W/m²)
Typical power	120 W	240 W
Max hang	20 panels	12 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	ADJ AV6X	ROE Visual CB5 MkII
Wall built	14 × 8, 8.06 × 4.61 m	13 × 4, 7.80 × 4.80 m
Panels needed	112 + 6 spare	52 + 3 spare
Resolution	1,344 × 768 px	1,352 × 832 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,351 kg	674 kg
Load per point	~540 kg across 3	~270 kg across 3
Power, full white	33.6 kW	25 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	14	12
Data runs	2 at ≤56/port	3 at ≤24/port
Truck, linear	4.8 m	3.1 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.06 × 4.61 m and 7.80 × 4.80 m respectively.

What the numbers say

ROE Visual CB5 MkII resolves finer: 30,044 pixels per square metre against 27,778 for ADJ AV6X, 8% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 1,352 px across versus 1,344 px.
ROE Visual CB5 MkII is the lighter rig: 17 kg/m² against 32 kg/m². Across this wall that is 677 kg of difference, 674 kg versus 1,351 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
ADJ AV6X draws more: 904 W/m² against 667 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 33.6 kW versus 25 kW, and 14 versus 12 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on ADJ AV6X: 2 runs against 3, at 56 and 24 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 576 × 576 mm against 600 × 1200 mm, so 112 tiles versus 52 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 3.1 m for ROE Visual CB5 MkII against 4.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

ADJ AV6X vs ROE Visual CB5 MkII

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons