ADJ AV6X vs INFiLED ORAMT5.95

6 mm against 5.95 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.06 × 4.61 m and 8.00 × 5.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (27,778 and 28,224 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• INFiLED ORAMT5.95 is the lighter rig: 20 kg/m² against 32 kg/m². Across this wall that is 435 kg of difference, 916 kg versus 1,351 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• ADJ AV6X draws more: 904 W/m² against 720 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 33.6 kW versus 28.8 kW, and 14 versus 10 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on ADJ AV6X: 2 runs against 3, at 56 and 18 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 576 × 576 mm against 1000 × 1000 mm, so 112 tiles versus 40 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 2.5 m for INFiLED ORAMT5.95 against 4.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• ADJ AV6X: specs and calculator
• INFiLED ORAMT5.95: specs and calculator
• All ADJ panels
• All INFiLED panels

Related comparisons

• INFiLED ORAMT5.95 vs ROE Visual CB5 MkII
• INFiLED ORAMT5.95 vs ROE Visual V5S
• ADJ VS5 vs INFiLED ORAMT5.95
• INFiLED ORAMT5.95 vs YES TECH MG9 P5.9
• ADJ AV6X vs YES TECH MG9 P5.9
• ADJ AV6X vs Desay M6