RigPlan
Wall in. Truck list out.

INFiLED ORAMT5.95 vs ROE Visual CB5 MkII

5.95 mm against 5.77 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

INFiLED ORAMT5.95ROE Visual CB5 MkII
ManufacturerINFiLEDROE Visual
Pixel pitch5.95 mm5.77 mm
Cabinet1000 × 1000 mm600 × 1200 mm
Pixels per cabinet168 × 168104 × 208
Pixels per m²28,22430,044
Weight20.4 kg (20 kg/m²)12.2 kg (17 kg/m²)
Max power720 W (720 W/m²)480 W (667 W/m²)
Typical power240 W240 W
Max hangnot published12 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

INFiLED ORAMT5.95ROE Visual CB5 MkII
Wall built8 × 5 — 8.00 × 5.00 m13 × 4 — 7.80 × 4.80 m
Panels needed40 + 2 spare52 + 3 spare
Resolution1,344 × 840 px1,352 × 832 px
Weight incl. bumpers916 kg799 kg
Load per point~366 kg across 3~320 kg across 3
Power, full white28.8 kW25 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)1012
Data runs3 at ≤18/port3 at ≤24/port
Truck, linear2.5 m3.1 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 8.00 × 5.00 m and 7.80 × 4.80 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons