ROE Visual vs YES TECH
3 matched panels · 2.6 to 5.77 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
| ROE Visual | YES TECH |
|---|
| Panels listed | 19 | 9 |
| Pitch range | 1.56 to 8.9 mm | 1.9 to 5.9 mm |
| Cabinet formats | 500×500, 500×1000, 600×1200, 1000×1000 mm | 500×500, 1000×500 mm |
| Weight | 9 to 37 kg/m² | 16 to 26 kg/m² |
| Maximum draw | 420 to 960 W/m² | 420 to 700 W/m² |
| Brightness | 800 to 6,000 nits | 1,000 to 5,500 nits |
| Hang limit published | 19 of 19 | 0 of 9 |
| Typical draw published | 19 of 19 | 9 of 9 |
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
- ROE Visual and YES TECH overlap on 3 matched pairs between 2.6 and 5.77 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
- ROE Visual is the lighter cabinet in 3 of 3 matched pairs, YES TECH in 0. Across their lineups that is 9 to 37 kg/m² against 16 to 26 kg/m².
- ROE Visual draws less at full white in 2 of 3 matched pairs, YES TECH in 0, and 1 is within 5%. Lineups: 420 to 960 W/m² against 420 to 700 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
- Cabinet formats: ROE Visual builds in 500×500, 500×1000, 600×1200, 1000×1000 mm; YES TECH in 500×500, 1000×500 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
- A hanging limit is published for every one of its 19 panels by ROE Visual and for none of its 9 panels by YES TECH; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
- Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.
More