ROE Visual vs Unilumin

3 matched panels · 1.56 to 2.6 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets

The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.

Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.

What the sheets say

• ROE Visual and Unilumin overlap on 3 matched pairs between 1.56 and 2.6 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
• ROE Visual is the lighter cabinet in 2 of 3 matched pairs, Unilumin in 0, and 1 is within 5%. Across their lineups that is 9 to 37 kg/m² against 31 to 36 kg/m².
• ROE Visual draws less at full white in 0 of 3 matched pairs, Unilumin in 3. Lineups: 420 to 960 W/m² against 382 to 717 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
• Cabinet formats: ROE Visual builds in 500×500, 500×1000, 600×1200, 1000×1000 mm; Unilumin in 609.92×343.08, 500×500 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
• A hanging limit is published for every one of its 19 panels by ROE Visual and for 10 of its 11 panels by Unilumin; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
• Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.

Matched panels, side by side

Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.

• ROE Visual RB1.5 (1.56 mm) vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.5 (1.5875 mm)
• ROE Visual RB1.5 (1.56 mm) vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.5 (1.58 mm)
• ROE Visual DM2.6 (2.6 mm) vs Unilumin UpadIV-S 2.6 (2.6 mm)

More

• All ROE Visual panels
• All Unilumin panels
• All makers compared