RigPlan

Desay X3.9 vs ROE Visual GP3.9

3.906 mm against 3.91 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Desay X3.9ROE Visual GP3.9
ManufacturerDesayROE Visual
Pixel pitch3.906 mm3.91 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 1000 mm
Brightness5,000 nits5,000 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz7,680 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 100°160° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet128 × 128128 × 256
Pixels per m²65,53665,536
Weight10.5 kg (42 kg/m²)9 kg (18 kg/m²)
Max power160 W (640 W/m²)320 W (640 W/m²)
Typical power56 W160 W
Max hangnot published12 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Desay X3.9ROE Visual GP3.9
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare80 + 4 spare
Resolution2,048 × 1,152 px2,048 × 1,280 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,712 kg920 kg
Load per point~685 kg across 3~368 kg across 3
Power, full white23 kW25.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)810
Data runs6 at ≤31/port6 at ≤15/port
Truck, linear5.8 m4.4 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 5.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons