RigPlan
Wall in. Truck list out.

INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh vs Sharp LED-Q078e2

8.33 mm against 7.8 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

INFiLED ORAMT8.33 MeshSharp LED-Q078e2
ManufacturerINFiLEDSharp
Pixel pitch8.33 mm7.8 mm
Cabinet1000 × 1000 mm500 × 500 mm
Pixels per cabinet120 × 12064 × 64
Pixels per m²14,40016,384
Weight15.5 kg (16 kg/m²)8.5 kg (34 kg/m²)
Max power500 W (500 W/m²)160 W (640 W/m²)
Typical power166 W60 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

INFiLED ORAMT8.33 MeshSharp LED-Q078e2
Wall built8 × 5 — 8.00 × 5.00 m16 × 9 — 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed40 + 2 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution960 × 600 px1,024 × 576 px
Weight incl. bumpers720 kg1,424 kg
Load per point~288 kg across 3~570 kg across 3
Power, full white20 kW23 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)88
Data runs2 at ≤36/port2 at ≤126/port
Truck, linear2.5 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons