RigPlan

Glux TVsn19 vs ROE Visual RB1.9B

1.953 mm against 1.95 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Glux TVsn19ROE Visual RB1.9B
ManufacturerGluxROE Visual
Pixel pitch1.953 mm1.95 mm
Cabinet250 × 250 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness1,000 nits1,500 nits
Refresh rate3,600 Hz7,680 Hz
Viewing angle140° / 140°140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet128 × 128256 × 256
Pixels per m²262,144262,144
Weight2 kg (32 kg/m²)8.8 kg (35 kg/m²)
Max power75 W (1200 W/m²)160 W (640 W/m²)
Typical power36 W80 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Glux TVsn19ROE Visual RB1.9B
Wall built32 × 18, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed576 + 29 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution4,096 × 2,304 px4,096 × 2,304 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,552 kg1,348 kg
Load per point~621 kg across 3~539 kg across 3
Power, full white43.2 kW23 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)168
Data runs32 at ≤31/port32 at ≤7/port
Truck, linear15.2 m6.5 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons