RigPlan

Glux BAtn6 vs Leyard CLO7.8

6.9 mm against 7.8 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Glux BAtn6Leyard CLO7.8
ManufacturerGluxLeyard
Pixel pitch6.9 mm7.8 mm
Cabinet1000 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness5,000 nits6,000 nits
Refresh rate3,000 Hz1,920 Hz
Viewing angle140° / 140°140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet144 × 7264 × 64
Pixels per m²20,73616,384
Weight4.8 kg (10 kg/m²)5 kg (20 kg/m²)
Max power300 W (600 W/m²)300 W (1200 W/m²)
Typical power150 W150 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Glux BAtn6Leyard CLO7.8
Wall built8 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed72 + 4 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution1,152 × 648 px1,024 × 576 px
Weight incl. bumpers446 kg920 kg
Load per point~178 kg across 3~368 kg across 3
Power, full white21.6 kW43.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)816
Data runs2 at ≤50/port2 at ≤126/port
Truck, linear3.3 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons