RigPlan

Desay X3.9 vs ROE Visual BP3

3.906 mm against 3.91 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Desay X3.9ROE Visual BP3
ManufacturerDesayROE Visual
Pixel pitch3.906 mm3.91 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness5,000 nitsnot published
Refresh rate3,840 Hznot published
Viewing angle160° / 100°not published
Pixels per cabinet128 × 128128 × 128
Pixels per m²65,53665,536
Weight10.5 kg (42 kg/m²)8.7 kg (35 kg/m²)
Max power160 W (640 W/m²)170 W (680 W/m²)
Typical power56 W85 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Desay X3.9ROE Visual BP3
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution2,048 × 1,152 px2,048 × 1,152 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,712 kg1,314 kg
Load per point~685 kg across 3~526 kg across 3
Power, full white23 kW24.5 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)89
Data runs6 at ≤31/port6 at ≤31/port
Truck, linear5.8 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons